Thursday, July 28, 2022

Melting Away of Feedburner Email Feeds / Notepad

Back in 2017, my webmaster and I set up a link on Discoveries in Health Policy (upper right) that lets you either subscribe via a blog reader, OR, by email feed.

I described some of this here, partly, to keep track of it myself:

https://brucedocumentblog.blogspot.com/2017/07/feedlink-for-blog-readers-daily-email.html

I've been reading about Google (which owns blogger.com) discontinuing the email reader or other supporting services.  For example:

https://techcrunch.com/2021/04/14/googles-feedburner-moves-to-a-new-infrastructure-but-loses-its-email-subscription-service/

https://support.google.com/blogger/answer/10477563

"Email widget going away."  One "support note" source from Google Support said that email feeds would stop in July 2021, but experience shows they may have survived til July 2022.

I noticed my own feeds from my website, by email, stopped on July 22, 2022.   I'm working on a workaround.  I was able to download a list of 500 subscriber emails (the round number suggests this may have been a maximum?).

I am working on getting a different commercial email service for Discoveries in Health Policy.  When I do, I will notify prior subscribers (from my Excel name list) how to re subscribe on a new service. And we will post the new email subscription service back at the top of the blog.

##

Here's an article on how to use MailOptIn and/or MailChimp to send blog posts by email:

https://barn2.com/mailchimp-wordpress-blog-posts-by-email/

Here's Best Alternatives to Feedburner 2022

https://wplift.com/best-alternatives-to-feedburner

https://www.feedblitz.com/   and   https://www.feedblitz.com/?s=blog+email

https://www.feedblitz.com/choosing-an-email-subscription-service-for-your-blog/






Wednesday, July 27, 2022

Books on Classificaton (Race)

 New July 2022

CLASSIFIED:  Untold Story of Racial Classification

David Bernstein

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09Z3894L6/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1

This book focuses on MODERN racial classification, such as "Black owned business" special categories.  To do so, you have to define "Black" (1/2, 1/4, other facts).  From perspective of immigration attorney.


From 2016, THE MYTH OF RACE: Troubling Persistence of an Unscientific Idea, Robert Sussman.

https://www.amazon.com/Myth-Race-Troubling-Persistence-Unscientific/dp/067466003X/ref=asc_df_067466003X/

There's also from 2011

The Nature of Race: How Scientists Think and Teach about Human Difference

Ann Morning

https://www.amazon.com/Nature-Race-Scientists-Think-Difference/dp/0520270312/ref=asc_df_0520270312/

'

Classification: UCSD Map of Science

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3395643/


Book that impressed me early:
SORTING THINGS OUT:  Classification and its Consequences

2000

Geoffrey Bowker and Susan Leigh Star

https://www.amazon.com/Sorting-Things-Out-Classification-Consequences/dp/0262522950/ref=sr_1_1


Hitler's American Model, James Q Whitman, Yale, 2017

https://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-American-Model-audiobook/dp/B079HBC8N2/ref=sr_1_1

(Believe there is also a heritage of Nazi laws in colonial laws in Germany and elsewhere, not much mentioned by Whitman.)  (Books in German and occ. English by Johannes Stoye, I have Brit Empire in ENG and I think I also have his Amerika book in German).  


Two Nuremberg JD's were Wilhelm Stuckart and and Bernhard Loesener.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernhard_L%C3%B6sener

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Stuckart

I think there was some 3rd attorney who studied a year at Georgetown or etc. who influenced Stuckart and Loesener.  ARKANSAS: KREGER, infra.


Murray State Laws on Race and Color

https://www.amazon.com/States-Color-Studies-Legal-History/dp/082035063X/ref=sr_1_1

Pauli Murray.  Reprint 2016.  Original circa 1951.  REview 1952:

https://www.jstor.org/stable/2715497  in J Negro Hist 37:327.


MORE NAZI

Complicity and lesser evils: Tale of two layers.   David Luban, Georgetown 2021

https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3386&context=facpub

Another German leader was Ludwig Fischer, see Atlantic 2017 Ira Katznelson

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/11/what-america-taught-the-nazis/540630/

German attorney names, Nuremberg, include Roland Freisler, Herbert Kier, Heinrich Kreger, "THE SINGLE MOST IMPT FIGURE" spent year at UNIV ARKANSAS.  (Per Katznelson)

2001, Racial Purity Laws in the US and NAzi Germany, in Human Rights Quarterly, by Judy Scales-Trent     https://www.jstor.org/stable/4489335.
Also here

https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1825&context=journal_articles


WSJ on "Medical Education Goes Woke"

https://www.wsj.com/articles/medical-training-goes-woke-association-of-american-medical-colleges-doctors-11658871789?mod=hp_opin_pos_1


AMA quotes on race 2021

http://www.discoveriesinhealthpolicy.com/2021/07/ama-publishes-report-on-legacy-of-white.html

AAMC in STAT July 2022

https://www.statnews.com/2022/07/14/new-medical-education-competencies-diversity-equity-inclusion/

Gender identity in HHS rulemaking on ACA 1557, July 2022

http://www.discoveriesinhealthpolicy.com/2022/07/cms-releases-new-proposed-rule-for.html









Tuesday, July 26, 2022

2021: The Allomap (Non) NCD

I had forgotten this minor NCD event in 2020/2021.  Access documents here:

https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/ncacal-tracking-sheet.aspx?NCAId=302


_________


ALLOMAP was an early (2006) advanced molecular MAAA test of lymphocyte activation to predict cardiac transplant rejection.   The test got FDA approval (though as a sole source lab test, not a kit) in 2008.

In a January 2013 letter, a Johns Hopkins professor asked for a non coverage NCD on ALLOMAP.  The 84-page letter is clearly dated January 2013, but the Tracking Sheet shows all events being years later - request accepted 10/2020 (COVID year).

CMS issued a  proposed memo 10/2020 (thus opening the issue with proposed memo), and final memo 4/2021.

Note the seven year time span between the 2013 request letter and the 2020 activities at CMS.

The final decision was to leave ALLOMAP test as an LCD issue not an NCD issue.


####
Quoting CMS:

We believe the decision to continue to allow MACs to determine coverage of ALLOMAP® Molecular Expression Testing for Detection of Rejection of Cardiac Allografts is clinically appropriate and in the best interest of beneficiaries.  Since 2013, when we received the request to open an NCD to non-cover ALLOMAP, there have been several new studies published in the peer-reviewed medical literature evaluating the test (e.g., Deng 2014, Kobashigawa 2015, Crespo-Leiro 2015 and 2016, Fujita 2017, Moyayedi 2019), focusing on predictive value and clinical utility.[1]  

While each study has limitations, collectively they demonstrate that use of the test may better allow physicians to select patients who should undergo post-transplant heart biopsy.  Specifically, the evidence indicates that the test may add value to selected patients, especially those for whom invasive biopsy poses greater risk due to poor venous access, scar tissue or other factors.  

Due to the very low volume of tests and affected beneficiaries, and the need for careful patient selection, CMS believes that coverage of ALLOMAP is an appropriate determination made by the Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs).  The MACs are structured to be able to take into account local patient, clinician and institutional factors, which are important when the overall prevalence is low.

##

It's code 81595. In CY2020, there were about 7000 uses in Part B for about $22M.

The company is increasingly using a different test, I believe, the ALLOSURE test, which detects donor DNA being leaked by a rejecting donor organ.  A similar test is also commercialized by Natera.

81595 was one of the first CPT MAAA codes, in about 2014.   As I recall, CMS proposed to price it at a very low rate, which was later raised to over $2000 as it was moved from a proposed to a final rate.   The current rate (set by PAMA in 2018) is around $3800.    





Tuesday, July 12, 2022

COVID-19 Reverses Progress in Fight Against Antimicrobial Resistance

 COVID-19 Reverses Progress in Fight Against Antimicrobial Resistance in U.S.

Hospitalization related infections grew 15% from 2019 to 2020


 

https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2022/s0712-Antimicrobial-Resistance.html  

The COVID-19 pandemic pushed back years of progress made combating antimicrobial resistance (AR) in the United States. The report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), COVID-19: U.S. Impact on Antimicrobial Resistance, Special Report 2022, concludes that the threat of antimicrobial-resistant infections is not only still present but has gotten worse—with resistant hospital-onset infections and deaths both increasing at least 15% during the first year of the pandemic.

 

“This setback can and must be temporary. The COVID-19 pandemic has unmistakably shown us that antimicrobial resistance will not stop if we let down our guard; there is no time to waste,” said Michael Craig, MPP, Director of CDC’s Antibiotic Resistance Coordination & Strategy Unit. “The best way to avert a pandemic caused by an antimicrobial-resistant pathogen is to identify gaps and invest in prevention to keep our nation safe.”

 

In the report, CDC analyzed the state of antimicrobial resistance in the United States immediately following the 2020 peaks of the COVID-19 pandemic. The data show an alarming increase in resistant infections starting during hospitalization, growing an overall 15% from 2019 to 2020 among seven pathogens. Increases in specific pathogens included:

  • carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter – 78% increase in infections,
  • multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa – 32% increase in infections,
  • vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) – 14% increase in infections, and
  • methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) – 13% increase in infections.

Antifungal-resistant threats rose in 2020, too, including Candida auris—which increased 60% overall—and Candida species (excluding Candida auris), with a 26% increase in infections in hospitals. By comparison, in a 2019 report, significant national reductions in hospitals were celebrated, where antimicrobial-resistant infections fell by 27% 2012 to 2017; data show these reductions continued in hospitals until the pandemic began. Clostridioides difficile is the only healthcare-associated pathogen to improve in 2020, likely driven in part by changes in healthcare-seeking behavior.

 

In U.S. hospitals, CDC data show significant surges in antibiotic use and difficulty in following infection prevention and control guidance, which are key to preventing antimicrobial-resistant infections and their spread. During the pandemic, hospitals experienced personal protective equipment supply challenges, staffing shortages, and longer patient stays. Hospitals also treated sicker patients who required more frequent and longer use of medical devices like catheters and ventilators. The impact of the pandemic likely resulted in an increase of healthcare-associated, antimicrobial-resistant infections.

 

During the first year of the pandemic, more than 29,400 people died from antimicrobial-resistant infections commonly associated with healthcare. Of these, nearly 40% got the infection while they were in the hospital. The total national burden of deaths from AR may be much higher, but data gaps caused by the pandemic hinder that analysis. CDC has limited data for the spread of antimicrobial-resistant infections in the community; many clinics and healthcare facilities had limited services, served fewer patients, or closed their doors entirely in the face of challenges from COVID-19. Data are unavailable or delayed for nine of the 18 pathogens listed in CDC’s 2019 Antibiotic Resistance Threats Reports.

 

In the 2019 report, the last year comprehensive healthcare and community data were available to calculate, CDC estimated that more than 2.8 million antimicrobial-resistant infections occur in the U.S. each year, with more than 35,000 people dying as a result.   

 

Historic progress made in antibiotic prescribing was reversed as well during the pandemic. Antibiotics were often the first option given to treat those who presented with pneumonia-like symptoms of fever and shortness of breath even though this often represented the viral illness of COVID-19, for which antibiotics are not effective. From March 2020 to October 2020, almost 80% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 received an antibiotic. While some of this prescribing can be appropriate when risks for related bacterial or fungal infections are unknown, this high level of prescribing can also put patients at risk for side effects and create a pathway for resistance to develop and spread.

 

Despite the pandemic, in 2020, more than 90% of U.S. hospitals had an antibiotic stewardship program aligned with CDC’s Core Elements of Hospital Antibiotic Stewardship—which may have contributed to the reduction in Clostridioides difficile infections.

 

During the pandemic, many antimicrobial resistance programs contributed to stopping the spread of COVID-19. For example, CDC’s AR Solutions Initiative provided infection control expertise to healthcare facilities, many of them nursing homes, to perform more than 14,000 outbreak consultations; CDC’s AR Lab Network sequenced more than 4,700 SAR-CoV-2 genomes; and CDC’s NHSN, which drives patient safety programs by tracking antimicrobial-resistant infections and antibiotic use in healthcare, provided added capabilities to support COVID-19 data collection in hospitals and nursing homes.

 

“We need to emphasize and expand the implementation of the effective prevention strategies that are already in CDC’s toolbox to all healthcare facilities,” said Denise Cardo, MD, Director of CDC’s Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion. “The 2021 launch of the Global AR Lab and Response Network and the Global Action in Healthcare Network is an example of how aggressively CDC is moving to combat antimicrobial resistance not only in the U.S., but in nearly 50 countries across the world. We made significant progress before the pandemic, and I’m confident that we will make significant progress going forward.”

 

With prevention and preparedness as its top goal, CDC remains committed to the U.S. National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria (CARB) and will move forward by addressing gaps in the public health system and exploring investments in U.S. healthcare infrastructure in the following key areas:

  • Enhance Data Systems and Sharing: Expanding automation of electronic data under NHSN to allow healthcare facilities and systems to have information they need on antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance. Additionally, this includes sharing established networks like CDC’s AR Lab Network during emergencies, using telehealth for contact tracing, and working to support uninterrupted laboratory supplies and equipment for patient care and infection control.
  • Infection Control: Continuing to offer high-quality infection prevention and control training like Project Firstline to every healthcare professional and to healthcare facilities beyond hospitals, such as nursing homes and other long-term care facilities. This also means educating the public on how they can stop the spread of germs and practice infection prevention in the communities where they live and work.
  • Antibiotic/Antifungal Use and Access: Optimizing antibiotic use across all healthcare settings and implementing CDC’s Core Elements across healthcare settings. In addition, working to promote optimal antibiotic and antifungal use and tracking for companion animals and agriculture.
  • Environment and Sanitation: Expanding the capacity of the National Wastewater Surveillance System to collect antimicrobial resistance data from wastewater treatment plants and healthcare facilities, studying resistance in community and healthcare wastewater domestically and globally. This also includes expanding global capacities to fight antimicrobial resistance in the environment and monitor antimicrobial resistance across One Health.
  • Vaccines, Therapeutics, and Diagnostics: Enhancing interagency collaboration to accelerate research for developing new antibiotics, antifungals, and therapeutics. For example, working with the Food and Drug Administration to identify ways to support availability of decolonization products. This also includes supporting the use of vaccines to prevent infections, slow the spread of resistance, and reduce antibiotic use, and building a vaccine data platform to inform the development of new vaccines.

 

CDC is and will remain at the forefront of combating antimicrobial resistance. Though the pandemic reversed much of the progress in the past decade on infection prevention and control, the fight will now take on a renewed fervor in prevention-focused public health actions to keep the nation safe.

 

 

 

###


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

 

CDC works 24/7 protecting America’s health, safety and security. Whether disease starts at home or abroad, are curable or preventable, chronic or acute, or from human activity or deliberate attack, CDC responds to America’s most pressing health threats. CDC is headquartered in Atlanta and has experts located throughout the United States and the world.

 

 

 

 

 

If you would like to unsubscribe from this ListServ LIST, please send an email to LIST@cdc.gov, enter CDC in the email Subject, and include the following "one" line in the Body of the email: signoff MMWR-MEDIA Abstract- Tw.jpg
Abstract- Tw.jpg

Tuesday, June 14, 2022

Hereditary Cancer Germline Testing: NCD and LCD, "Risk factor" vs "Clinical indication"

MolDx has released a new and very different LCD for cancer germline testing.  These are LCD L38966 and billing article A58652.

The LCD simply states that the patient must have a cancer, and a clinical indication for testing, and a risk factor for testing.

The LCD, and the article, do NOT give any specific authoritative guidelines.   This will surprise readers who are used to a list of an LCD's complex rules for cancer testing such as a headcount of first degree relatives, or a history of Ashkenazi heritage, or a dozen other rules.

What are Clinical Indication and Risk Factor?

NCD 90.2 was revised in 2020 to include hereditary NGS panels.  The decision summary of the NCD is brief: a patient must have "any cancer diagnosis, a clinical indication for testing, a risk factor for testing." This is the same brief text as the new LCD.

But, the narrative analysis for the NCD provides definitions.  In fact, CMS remarked that one of the main revisions in the "final" hereditary LCD was to define for the reader, what they meant by clinical indications and risk factors.

https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/ncacal-decision-memo.aspx?proposed=N&ncaid=296

There, we read, 

Clinical indications are different from risk factors.  A RISK FACTOR is a variable associated with INCREASED RISK (such as age, gender, family history) absent signs and symptoms.

A CLINICAL INDICATION, is a sign, symptom, or test result, or medical condition, that leads to a recommendation for a test.  

RISK MODELS may use both risk factors (age) and clinical indications [to estimate a risk value].  For example, the FRAX fracture calculator uses age and sex which are generic factors and not considered illnesses or medical conditions, but also measured bone density or T score which is a medical sign or test result.)

Later in the NCD, lest there be any doubt, CMS states that "clinical indications (can be) a personal history of breast cancer or ovarian cancer."   This is important because it makes, at least sometimes, the two separate bullet points redundant.  (If "personal history cancer" can checkmark the other box, "clinical indication.")

___

While the MolDx LCD and Article don't name any guidelines, that I can see, we can refer to ABSA and the newest CRC version for NCCN.   Age > 65 is a risk factor, and a "sign or symptom" is having cancer.



Thursday, June 9, 2022

MACS Now Often List Webpages for Carrier-Priced Codes

 My memory is that ten or fifteen years ago, MACs never listed the prices of contractor-priced codes.   I recall one client being told, "We here at (MAC) have set your price, but if you want to know what it is, you have to submit a claim and look at the reimbursement, or else, file a FOIA request to learn what we priced you at."

Now, in 2022, it seems common that MACs have websites that show carrier-based priced.   This can have financial implications; for example, the main code used by the public comment iRhythm does not have a nationally set price, and investor analysts search around the MAC websites to find out the current price or if it has changed.

Here are some basic links.


  • CGS Administrators, LLC
    • Contractor Priced Codes Not Published
        •  

 

  • First Coast Service Options, Inc.
    • Contractor Priced Codes Published
        • 2022 Medicare Part B Contractor-Priced Codes for Florida
  • National Government Services, Inc.
    • Contractor Priced Codes Not Published
  • Noridian Healthcare Solutions, LLC
    •  
        • Contractor Status Codes (C-Status)

CMS does not establish fees for C status codes; they are priced per Contractor discretion. Each year these code prices are reviewed and revised (price increase and/or decrease varies from code to code). Normally, prices are not determined until they are billed. Our review of medical records will assist in the evaluation and pricing of these services. Updates to contractor priced fees will be posted quarterly.

  • Novitas Solutions, Inc.
    • Contractor Priced Codes Not Published
        • Local contractor pricing

Novitas will establish RVUs and payment amounts for these services, generally on an individual case basis following review of documentation. At this time Novitas does not have a published list of contractor priced codes.

  • Palmetto GBA, LLC
    • Contractor Priced Codes Not Published
  • Wisconsin Physician Service Government Health Administrators
    • Some Contractor Priced Codes Published
        •