http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/669947.pdf\
This is a 44 page report from GAO, 2015, on the structure of MAC contracts.
For a window into MAC contracting bids, here.
In the report above, GAO writes:
CMS selected a cost-plus-award-fee contract structure for the MACs when it
initially implemented contracting reform. This is a type of cost-reimbursement
contract that allows the agency to provide financial incentives for achieving
specific performance goals. While CMS has made modifications to its cost-plusaward-fee
structure for MAC contracts—such as revising the performance
metrics included in MACs’ award fee plans and adjusting the distribution of award
fees across the metrics to promote performance in areas where MACs have
performed poorly in the past—the agency has not formally revisited its MAC
contracting approach since the implementation of contracting reform. Moreover,
its assessment of alternative contracting approaches has been limited.
The
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) states that changing circumstances may
make different contracting approaches more appropriate later in the course of a
series of contracts or a long-term contract than they were at the outset. Further,
CMS indicated in its 2007 MAC acquisition strategy that once a baseline cost and
level of effort had been established, the agency would reassess whether the
cost-plus-award-fee contract structure was still appropriate for the MACs.
There
are a number of other contracting approaches that could be introduced within or
in addition to the cost-reimbursement structure. Without formally assessing the
potential benefits and risks of alternative contracting approaches, CMS may be
missing opportunities to enhance MACs’ efficiency and effectiveness.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.