Monday, July 19, 2021

Support Act, Exparel

 

Payment for Non-Opioid Products Under Section 6082 of the SUPPORT Act

The law requires that the Secretary must review payments under the OPPS and ASC for opioids and evidence-based non-opioid alternatives for pain management to ensure there are not financial incentives to use opioids instead of non-opioid alternatives. For CY 2022, CMS is proposing to modify its current policy, adopted under section 1833(t)(22)(A) and section 1833(i)(8), as added by section 6082(a) and (b), respectively, of the SUPPORT Act, to provide for separate or modified payment for non-opioid pain management drugs and biologicals that function as supplies in the ASC setting when those products meet certain criteria, as determined by CMS. 

https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/cy-2022-medicare-hospital-outpatient-prospective-payment-system-and-ambulatory-surgical-center


SSA 1833


(t)

(22   )[136]      Review and revisions of payments for non-opioid alternative treatments.—

(A) In general.—With respect to payments made under this subsection for covered OPD services (or groups of services), including covered OPD services assigned to a comprehensive ambulatory payment classification, the Secretary—

(i) shall, as soon as practicable, conduct a review (part of which may include a request for information) of payments for opioids and evidence-based non-opioid alternatives for pain management (including drugs and devices, nerve blocks, surgical injections, and neuromodulation) with a goal of ensuring that there are not financial incentives to use opioids instead of non-opioid alternatives;

(ii) may, as the Secretary determines appropriate, conduct subsequent reviews of such payments; and

(iii) shall consider the extent to which revisions under this subsection to such payments (such as the creation of additional groups of covered OPD services to classify separately those procedures that utilize opioids and non-opioid alternatives for pain management) would reduce payment incentives to use opioids instead of non-opioid alternatives for pain management.

(B) Priority.—In conducting the review under clause (i) of subparagraph (A) and considering revisions under clause (iii) of such subparagraph, the Secretary shall focus on covered OPD services (or groups of services) assigned to a comprehensive ambulatory payment classification, ambulatory payment classifications that primarily include surgical services, and other services determined by the Secretary which generally involve treatment for pain management.

(C) Revisions.—If the Secretary identifies revisions to payments pursuant to subparagraph (A)(iii), the Secretary shall, as determined appropriate, begin making such revisions for services furnished on or after January 1, 2020. Revisions under the previous sentence shall be treated as adjustments for purposes of application of paragraph (9)(B).

(D) Rules of construction.—Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to preclude the Secretary—

(i) from conducting a demonstration before making the revisions described in subparagraph (C); or

(ii) prior to implementation of this paragraph, from changing payments under this subsection for covered OPD services (or groups of services) which include opioids or non-opioid alternatives for pain management.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.