Monday, August 23, 2021

Prevent Cancer Dot Org - Multi Cancer Early Detection (MCED) (Access 8/23/2021)

 https://www.preventcancer.org/multi-cancer-early-detection/coverage-and-legislation/




Are these tests covered by insurance?

Currently, MCED tests are not covered by insurance. The Prevent Cancer Foundation and more than 300 advocacy organizations and cancer centers support the Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act of 2021. This legislation would authorize the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to evaluate and cover blood-based multi-cancer early detection tests and future test methods (e.g., urine or hair tests), once approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Under current law, Medicare coverage of preventive services is limited to tests for which Congress has explicitly authorized coverage.  Private insurers cover screening tests that receive an “A” or “B” recommendation from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). 

In the absence of congressional action, it could take several years after FDA approval before Medicare beneficiaries can receive coverage for MCED tests. This bill would greatly reduce such access delays for seniors while allowing CMS to use its evidence-based process to determine coverage.

What is the Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act of 2021?

The Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act is a bill that would authorize the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to evaluate and cover blood-based multi-cancer early detection tests and future test methods (e.g., urine or hair tests), once approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The House bill (H.R. 1946) was introduced with bipartisan support on March 16, 2021, and its companion bill in the Senate (S. 1873) was introduced on May 27, 2021.

Read the full text of the House bill.

Read the full text of the Senate bill.

The Prevent Cancer Foundation leads more than 300 organizations in support of the Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act of 2021.

The Prevent Cancer Foundation and more than 300 organizations from all 50 states joined together in a sign-on letter in support of the Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act of 2021.

National advocacy organizations who support the legislation include the American Cancer Society – Cancer Action Network, the National Minority Quality Forum, Cancer Support Community, the Association of Community Cancer Centers, the Community Oncology Alliance and the Oncology Nursing Society. A diverse array of additional medical, community and public health focused organizations across the country joins with the Prevent Cancer Foundation in applauding the legislation and calling for action on this issue. These organizations provide essential services to cancer patients, offer resources to families, and raise awareness of the need to improve prevention and care for a range of different cancers.

Read the full letter.

How does the MCED legislation work in practice if passed by Congress?

The Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act modernizes the Medicare program and creates a benefit category for MCED tests, which allows the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to initiate an evidenced-based coverage process for multi-cancer tests upon FDA approval. 

The legislation was drafted based on the colorectal and prostate cancer screening legislation from the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 that established a covered benefit for colorectal and prostate cancer screening tests and granted the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) the authority to cover new screening technologies for these cancers.

The Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act does not establish coverage policy for MCED tests, but rather gives CMS the authority to create coverage parameters through the National Coverage Determination (NCD) process. During this process, CMS evaluates the evidence for available tests to establish patient criteria.  The NCD process includes multiple opportunities for stakeholder input through a comment period before finalizing coverage.

Why is FDA approval required?

The Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act is for screening tests, not diagnostics. Diagnostic tests are routinely covered by Medicare and do not require congressional action, but for screening tests to obtain Medicare coverage through a National Coverage Determination, it must fit within a “benefit” category. (Under the Affordable Care Act, Medicare is also required to cover cancer screening tests that are given an “A” or “B” grade by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.)

The Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act is based on the precedent of Congress’ authorization of Medicare coverage of mammography for breast cancer, Pap test for cervical cancer and screening tests for colorectal and prostate cancers (all requiring FDA approval). Congressional action is necessary to pursue a National Coverage Determination after FDA approval.

CMS’ National Coverage Determinations for cancer screenings have only provided coverage to FDA approved tests, including Cologuard (colorectal cancer screening), HPV tests approved by the FDA, and a recent blood-based biomarker test for colorectal cancer screening.

What are the benefits of introducing legislation before FDA approval of MCED tests?

Passing legislation can be a lengthy process. By starting now, it is possible to have legislation enacted by the time these new tests are approved by the FDA and prevent significant patient access delays. If Congress decides not to introduce legislation until tests are approved by the FDA, patients could face several years of access delays as the legislative process moved forward. 

Why not create coverage authority for all new cancer screenings?

The Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act does not prevent any other efforts to create coverage for new single-cancer screening tests.  The policy is focused on multi-cancer tests because it is where coverage barriers are most acute. New multi-cancer early detection tests can help maximize cancer detection by adding an additional tool to our existing arsenal of cancer screenings. By creating coverage authority for MCED tests, Congress can fuel additional development of multi-cancer screenings.

Is coverage or cost-sharing for existing screenings impacted by MCED legislation or these tests?

No. Existing screenings save lives, and it is important that patients maintain adherence to existing screenings and continue to benefit from zero cost-sharing.  For this reason, the legislation states that coverage of existing screenings should not be impacted.

How much does this policy score?

This policy has not been scored by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). Historically, CBO has scored preventive services and cancer screening as impacting the federal budget, in part because CBO will attribute costs associated with lives saved from the benefits of early detection.

According to CBO, the agency is required by federal law to undertake a formal cost estimate for most legislative proposals (except appropriations measures) that are passed out of a House or Senate full committee. CBO cost estimates employ certain economic assumptions and require the agency to make projections over a period of time, usually 10 years. CBO scores use current federal law as a baseline for its assumptions and the agency does not presume any future modifications that might be made to federal laws, programs or spending.1  


1. The District Policy Group, “CBO Score,” Washington, D.C. Accessed April 2021. http://www.districtpolicygroup.com/dewonkify-detail/dewonkify-cbo-score#:~:text=Definition%3A%20%22Score%22%20or%20%22,Congressional%20Budget%20Office%20(CBO)

Tuesday, August 3, 2021

Medlearn Matters re IDTF and Preventive Services

 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PyHjynk5BEjbjFzHD9zLDPeylt88scb4/view?usp=sharing   

Above, you have links to my own cloud copy of MM9246.  

But I downloaded it within the last couple years, almost certainly in 2020.

DEAD LINK:



Screen shot of document:


Also, if you go direct to the CMS website, you can't find this by CMS key word searches.

MM9246 was a 2015 document with instructions for Low Dose CT Lung Cancer / and it reflected a 2017 revision adding the IDTF text.


There are remaining contemporary documents that cite the once-live CMS link from 2017 or so.

At ACR for example


At Novitas for example


Monday, August 2, 2021

Covid Links for Unusual Facts

NYT 7/29/91

If we must wear masks again, we need a smart approach.  Nuzzo & Blauer.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/29/opinion/mask-mandate-cdc-covid.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage

WSJ August 3, Masks are a Distraction

https://www.wsj.com/articles/masks-covid-cdc-vaccination-mandate-provincetown-biden-11627940971

NY 

Do Masks Matter in Schools?

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/08/the-science-of-masking-kids-at-school-remains-uncertain.html


NYT 7/28/91

A confusing message [from CDC.]  Leonhardt.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/28/briefing/mask-guidance-cdc-vaccinated.html

NYT 7/30/2021

More COVID mysteries.  (Peak, fall.)  Osterholm/U MN.  Leonhardt.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/30/briefing/coronavirus-delta-mysteries.html

NYT 7/29/2021

Vaccine mandates bigger than "mask mandates."  Leonhardt.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/29/briefing/mask-mandates-coronavirus.html

Alternate:
School masks save lives, Duke, NYT

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/10/opinion/covid-schools-masks.html

At same time as WSJ, Masks don't save lives or matter

https://www.wsj.com/articles/masks-children-parenting-schools-mandates-covid-19-coronavirus-pandemic-biden-administration-cdc-11628432716?mod=searchresults_pos1&page=1


TWITTER

JHowardBrainMD - Pediatrics and Covid (Has email)


CNN
White House Protests Adverse Press (Lots of Sick Vaccinated People)

https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/30/media/variant-media-coverage-white-house/

Good Housekeeping - How good are masks. N95 better.  Links to Mayo.

https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/health/a37135570/best-face-masks-delta-variant/

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-mask/art-20485449#:~:text=An%20N95%20mask%20is%20a,when%20the%20wearer%20inhales.

MASK ADHERENCE AND COVID RATES - FISCHER (2 10 2021)

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.18.21250029v2

PLOS ONE also

Looked at mask adherence not mask policy

   Not clear corrected for lockdown, closures, etc.

What the evidence for masking

Vinay Prasads MD

https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/vinay-prasad/93803


Mask Free Sweden = Zero Deaths

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/health/medical/mask-free-sweden-is-close-to-zero-daily-covid-deaths/ar-AAMSKMZ?li=AAJt1k3&srcref=rss


WHO Different Countries and Mask rules

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/07/drones-and-harry-potter-memes-how-to-persuade-people-to-wear-masks/



HIV not good for COVID

https://www.hivplusmag.com/world-news/2021/7/15/people-living-hiv-have-higher-risk-death-covid-19

https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/342697/WHO-2019-nCoV-Clinical-HIV-2021.1-eng.pdf



SARS Super Antibiodies

https://www-news--medical-net.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/www.news-medical.net/amp/news/20210705/Scientists-identify-natural-SARS-CoV-2-super-immunity-against-23-variants.aspx

Wang et al science

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2021/06/30/science.abh1766




COVID and Children.  Jonathan Howard.

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/cognitive-illusions-and-how-not-to-write-about-covid-19-and-children/

Versus Med Page Today makary

https://trialsitenews.com/theres-no-need-to-vaccinate-healthy-kids-according-to-medpage-today-editor/

Vinay Prasad and Children

https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/vinay-prasad/93453

Vinay: 
WHo are the real Experts

https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/vinay-prasad/92652


Gottlieb says; COvid gone soon (Maps to other surges which led to dramatic fall-offs, as Leonhardt at NYT discussed and earlier BQ Linked IN article)

https://www.dailysignal.com/2021/07/31/delta-variant-of-covid-19-soon-will-be-gone-former-fda-chief-predicts/

USA big red map of COVID high rates per CDC (consider 7X change of scale)

https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/graphics/2021/07/29/cdc-mask-guidelines-map-high-covid-transmission-county/5400268001/

It's a live map for every county in US. Polk County is High at 66 (10 per 100K per day), while places in FL have 500 (70 per 100k per day).  I suspect, but don't know, this might be a current map (?).






CNN, What Subst. and High mean.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/28/health/substantial-or-high-covid-19-transmission-wellness/index.html

CDC has a live map by County (but the actual numbers don't auto pop like in the USA map.)

https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#county-view

Specifically, a "Low" transmission is considered no more than 10 cases per 100,000 people, or a test positivity rate of less than 5%. "Moderate" transmission is 10 to 50 cases per 100,000 people, or a positivity rate between 5% and 8%. "Substantial" transmission is 50 to 100 cases per 100,000, or a positivity rate between 8% and 10%, and "high" transmission is 100 or more cases per 100,000 people or a positivity rate of 10% or higher.

Separate:
Future belongs to Digital Pathology

http://geekdoctor.blogspot.com/2021/07/the-future-belongs-to-digital-pathology.html

Kaiser Tool to Predict Surges

https://medcitynews.com/2021/07/kaiser-permanente-creates-tool-to-predict-upcoming-covid-19-surges/?rf=1

Bullsh## Book

Carl Bergstrom

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08191DV5T/ref=redir_mobile_desktop?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1627790651&ref_=tmm_kin_swatch_0&sr=8-3


Join me in the fight against COVID misinformation

https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/kevinmd/93832

Kevin MD   Tomi Mitchell MD


####

BRUCE QUINN:
PEAKS AND PLUMMETS ARE COMMON, YET WE'RE MYSTIFIED!

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/wapo-mystified-falling-uk-cases-yet-peakplummet-pattern-bruce-quinn/

THE CDC's 7X SWITCH - BAIT AND SWITCH?

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/vinay-prasads-op-ed-cdc-mask-evidence-bruce-quinn/

LA TIMES PUBLISHES HIGHLY MISLEADING COVID STATS

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/los-angeles-times-publishes-highly-misleading-covid-numbers-quinn/

VERY UNUSAL COVID SURGE IN UPPER CLASS LA (MID JULY POST)

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/bruce-quinn-2831674_los-angeles-county-coronavirus-cases-tracking-activity-6821560353177112577-4UNM

See Later July 29:

https://deadline.com/2021/07/los-angeles-covid-surge-driven-by-white-affluent-neighborhoods-1234802675/

and Santa Monica in NYT

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/01/us/covid-santa-monica-icu.html

and August 5 at Crosstown LA (XtownLA / USC)

https://xtown.la/2021/08/05/delta-covid-surge-los-angeles/


I AM PRO MASKING BUT C'MON (LA WINTER)

https://twitter.com/brucequinnmd/status/1423766385243484162







BRUCE
All you need to know about infectiousness and evolution of Delta - UK

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/bruce-quinn-2831674_covid-activity-6817884184653254657-zFwm

####


Masks Objective Data

Howard J,  evidence review of face masks, PNAS Jan 2021

https://www.pnas.org/content/118/4/e2014564118

(Not, review of face mask policies.)
(Face mask policies affect eg. people in Target.  Covid affects everyone 24/7.)

AIM, Bae, Surgical v cotton masks in COVID in 4 patients, July 2020

https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/m20-1342

Nature, 9/2020, Asadi, Efficacy of masks and face coverings

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-72798-7

PNAS, 5/2021, under review 9-2020 to 3-2021, Bazant and Bush

https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/118/17/e2018995118.full.pdf


20210812


https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-08-11/despite-surge-california-doing-much-better-with-delta-variant-than-florida-texas-heres-why


https://theconversation.com/compare-the-flu-pandemic-of-1918-and-covid-19-with-caution-the-past-is-not-a-prediction-138895



Everyone should just wear a mask; swiftly effective.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/12/health/covid-masks-cdc.html


Dakotas; Plummet Both

https://www.postbulletin.com/newsmd/coronavirus/6824462-North-Dakota-got-a-mask-mandate-South-Dakota-didnt.-COVID-19-cases-have-plummeted-in-both




Numerous WaPo national county maps (low med high COVID, low med high VAX)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/interactive/2021/vaccinated-counties-delta-hotspots/?itid=hp-top-table-main

CDC JAMA EARLY 2021

Brooks and Butler: Effectivenses of mask wearing

No argument for SOME reduction but much anecodotal or uncontrolled data like "temporal association"

Real data as high as 70% but sometimes lower in table

Self report confounds for other behaviors (avoiding crowded bars and indoor poker parties)


https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2776536

Puzzlingly, there is an op ed but apepared in July 2020 of 8 months earlier

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2768532

Brooks, Butler, Redfield, Masking - time is Now.

Based on Wang et al, universal masking in a Mass. health system.

Wang et al here

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2768533

Not community masking - bad extrapolation

ALSO the HEALTHCARE impact was MODEST

the SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate among health care workers declined from 14.65% to 11.46%


October 2020

Lerner et al, Lerner Folkers Fauci

Low Tech interventions

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2772459

Focuses on "filtering efficacy" rather than "wearing effectiveness"

Surgical masks can reduce respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath,5 and the filtering efficacy of some materials used in cloth masks may approach that of surgical masks.6

LEUNG et al

any LAB STUDy biasd to best performance

Any RWE study biasd for "choice of person" eg avoid bar

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8238571/




Substack - Emily Oster - We Don't Have Needed Data

Delta variant means anxiety in California

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-08-20/why-delta-variant-makes-mask-and-vaccine-mandates-essential


Bloomberg - too much caution is bad for kids

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-08-20/covid-in-the-schools-too-much-caution-will-hurt-children

Fast Comapny - Can schools open safely  By brandon guthrie

https://www.fastcompany.com/90668041/how-can-schools-reopen-safely-heres-what-an-epidemiologist-suggests?partner=rss&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss+fastcompany&utm_content=rss

SAME  Schools can open safely- An epidem. describes.

https://theconversation.com/schools-can-reopen-safely-an-epidemiologist-describes-what-works-and-whats-not-worth-the-effort-165594

###

WAPO. Europes growing mask ask: Medical grade

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/europe-coronavirus-masks-regulations/2021/01/20/23463c08-5a74-11eb-a849-6f9423a75ffd_story.html

Delt and hybrid immunity - Jenkins

https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-19-coronavirus-delta-hybrid-natural-immunity-vaccine-breakthrough-cases-11629492042

CANADIAN PAPER on 10% BLUE MASKS - - - - -

PAPER

https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0057100

PRESS RELEASE

https://uwaterloo.ca/news/media/study-supports-widespread-use-better-masks-curb-covid-19

DAILY MAIL

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9914969/Popular-blue-surgical-face-masks-NOT-stop-people-infected-COVID-19.html


NYT - US gets crash course in pandemic SCIENCE uncertainy

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/22/health/coronavirus-covid-usa.html


Klompas rec N95 masks May 2021

https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab539/6296401?login=true


https://twitter.com/brucequinnmd/status/1430052553576771584


https://twitter.com/Oshoaum1/status/1430219093987184643/photo/1




Bruce Table of Masks


Yet NYT says "virus can't cut through paper"
As many Americans begin the familiar exercise of questioning and calling off plans, scientists are stressing the continued importance of mask-wearing to reduce transmission and infection.

“If you get infected and breathe virus out, it will get trapped by your mask,” said Dr. John Moore, a professor of microbiology and immunology at Weill Cornell. “These viruses don’t have pairs of scissors that can cut through masks.”

Bruce Pew Polarized


Masks may not have "caused" Surge dip in SF area

NYT has 3 articles on Mask Policy, none of which discuss efficacy except one which is hand waving and mistitled.

Aug 30 Hard questions we're not asking

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/30/opinion/us-covid-policy.html

July 29

If we must wear masks we need a smarter approach

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/29/opinion/mask-mandate-cdc-covid.html

August 10

We studied 1M students...

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/10/opinion/covid-schools-masks.html

##



Shay - Navigating Spaghetti Junction - Medicare's Dx Test Rules

 https://www.gosfield.com/images/DFS.NavSpaghettiJunc.PrePubDraft.011420.pdf

46pp