Do ChatGPT3.5 and ChatGPT4 summarize the same meeting differently?

 I have generally used ChatGTP-3.5 to summarize meetings or transcripts because it seems to work fine.   Potentially, GTP-4 is better because it is smarter or retains a longer train (transcript) of information.  I summarized a meeting in both 3.5 and 4, and asked 3.5 to compare the two summary work products.

The result is verbatim except where I've tweaked to ensure the actual meeting is unknowable.

Comparison of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 Meeting Summaries:

Focus and Emphasis:

GPT-3.5: The GPT-3.5 summary places more emphasis on the specific topics discussed during the meeting, such as Medicare coverage, health economics, genomic data, and coding options for ADLTs.

GPT-4: The GPT-4 summary focuses on broader aspects, such as clarifying roles and responsibilities, legal matters, project timeline, coverage pathways, and understanding the client's organizational structure.

Agenda and Preparation:

GPT-3.5: The GPT-3.5 summary gives a detailed account of Bruce's plan and the specific topics to be covered in the meeting.

GPT-4: The GPT-4 summary highlights Bruce's outline of subjects for discussion, but it also mentions additional details like new guidance from CMS and updates on legal battles.

Participant Engagement:

GPT-3.5: The GPT-3.5 summary mentions specific interactions among participants, like expressions of thanks and enthusiasm for the project's output.

GPT-4: The GPT-4 summary does not include as much detail about participant interactions and focuses more on the content discussed.

Document Sharing:

GPT-3.5: The GPT-3.5 summary includes a mention of Bruce seeking permission to share his screen and having small talk about the weather while doing so.

GPT-4: The GPT-4 summary mentions Bruce sharing a revised Word document outlining his ideas and approaches to the project, which was not specified in the GPT-3.5 summary.

Key Lessons and Next Steps:

GPT-3.5: The GPT-3.5 summary provides clear take-home lessons and next steps related to the meeting's outcomes, such as the need to incorporate recent developments and the commitment to bring the test to market promptly.

GPT-4: The GPT-4 summary offers more general take-home lessons, like the importance of good communication and thorough research. It also outlines specific next steps, including the exploration of a particular question about [TOPIC] test coverage.

Presentation Style:

GPT-3.5: The GPT-3.5 summary follows a more narrative and descriptive style, providing specific details of the meeting's content and interactions.

GPT-4: The GPT-4 summary appears more concise and structured, with a focus on key points and outcomes without extensive narrative descriptions.

Overall, both summaries effectively capture the essence of the business meeting. 

The GPT-3.5 summary dives deeper into the specifics of the discussion topics and participant interactions, while the GPT-4 summary takes a more top-level approach, highlighting broader aspects of the meeting, such as organizational structure and legal matters. The GPT-4 summary also includes more explicit take-home lessons and action points, providing a clearer roadmap for the project's progress. However, the choice between the two summaries would depend on the context and purpose of the summary's usage, as each version has its strengths and areas of emphasis.