At the February 17, 2022, FDA town hall on future accelerated coverage, several speakers suggested the simple Category B process might work.
CMS coverage of Category B trials dates to 1995 (60 FR 4817, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1995-09-19/pdf/95-23132.pdf , and resolved lawsuits (example) (example) about coverage or non coverage of these trials at MACs in the 1980s. The 1995 Fed Reg document is cogent and well-written.
Since 2015, Category B trials are reviewed centrally by CMS, https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coverage/IDE .
While each is reviewed, they are normally covered per their ClinicalTrials.gov protocols and and in a volume matching the ClinTrials protocol for patient numbers. Category B trials are the usual FDA status for 510k or PMA clinical studies, few are rated FDA Category B which would be a non covered investigational device. For more, see FDA guidance document 2017, https://www.fda.gov/media/98578/download .
Medicare has a “Medical Devices” policy manual which is not about devices in general but rather, about Category B IDE trial devices, https://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/guidance/manuals/downloads/bp102c14.pdf .
__
The Yale cases about IDE reimbursements stem from 1994/1995, and were still in litigation as Yale v Leavitt at least as late as 2006, 22 years later. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-2nd-circuit/1337231.html See also Jarndyce.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.