Lewis Black on "Sounds Like Chat GPT"

Main Blog, https://www.discoveriesinhealthpolicy.com/2024/02/ai-corner-devilish-version-professor.html

What would Lewis Black make of the above blog? 

Lewis Black, known for his acerbic wit and capacity to zero in on absurdities within societal and professional arenas, might have a field day with the scenario outlined in the article. Imagine him, eyebrows furrowed and fingers wagging, as he dissects the situation with his characteristic blend of humor and incredulity.

Firstly, he would likely seize upon the irony of the rejection reason: a manuscript dismissed because it "sounded like Chat GPT" when it wasn't. Black could riff on the existential crisis academics and writers might face in a world where their work's authenticity is questioned based on a resemblance to AI-generated content—highlighting the absurdity of judging human intellect and creativity through the lens of machine output.

He might also poke fun at the unverifiable nature of such a critique—how it places the accused in a Kafkaesque predicament where proving one's work doesn't sound like it was generated by AI becomes a bizarre, modern-day trial by ordeal. Black could highlight the frustration of the author, having to defend the uniqueness of their human voice against an AI standard that's both arbitrary and nebulous.

Then, turning to the whimsical solution—the author letting ChatGPT not only read and edit the essay but also translate it and create related content—Black might marvel at the irony. He could joke about the author essentially saying, "You think it sounds like AI? I'll show you AI," using the technology to enhance the essay and expand its reach, thereby turning the critique on its head.

In this speculative scenario, Lewis Black could underscore the larger conversation about AI's role in creative and academic fields. He might question where we draw the line between human and machine creativity and whether the fear of AI is overshadowing the value of genuine human expression. Through his unique lens, Black could transform a frustrating academic ordeal into a commentary on the absurdities of our increasingly digital world, all while making us laugh and think.

User

Can you produce a first person monolog on these lines?

ChatGPT

Absolutely, let's dive into a first-person monologue inspired by Lewis Black's perspective on the situation:

I recently stumbled upon a story so ludicrous, it had me spitting out my coffee—and not in a good way. Picture this: a Canadian professor pens an essay, pours their soul into it, only for it to get slapped down by a reviewer. The reason? It "sounded like Chat GPT." I mean, what in the hell does that even mean? Since when did academic critique devolve into comparing scholarly work to the output of a glorified calculator?

So there I was, fuming, incredulous, but also, let's admit it, a tad amused. The accusation itself is as unfalsifiable as my claim that I could have been a great opera singer. You can't prove it, you can't disprove it, and just like that, you're caught in this absurd dance of justifying your human authenticity to a shadow jury skeptical of your organic brainpower.

But then, this professor—oh, this professor—decides to take the road less traveled. They go, "You want AI? I'll give you AI." And they let Chat GPT, the heart of the controversy, not just read and edit their essay, but also translate it into French and whip up a couple of illustrations to boot. It's like watching someone accused of witchcraft turn around and summon a unicorn to the courtroom.

It's a masterstroke, really. They took the critique, flipped it on its head, and in doing so, showcased not just the absurdity of the initial accusation but the potential of AI to complement human creativity, not contest it.

Now, here's where I come in, shaking my head and laughing, because isn't this just the perfect snapshot of our times? We're living in an era where the line between human and machine, creativity and computation, is getting blurrier by the day. And yet, instead of embracing this new frontier, we're out here playing "Who's the Robot?" in academic journals.

Let's be clear: I'm not against AI. If anything, I'm all for using it to enhance our work, expand our capabilities. But when we start questioning the humanity behind someone's work simply because it's "too polished" or "too coherent," maybe it's time to step back and ask ourselves: Have we lost sight of what it means to be human in the first place?

So, to that professor, I say bravo. Not just for defending your work, but for turning a moment of frustration into a profound commentary on creativity, technology, and the essence of human expression. And to the rest of us, maybe it's time to accept that the future is here, and it's filled with AI, humans, and, if we're lucky, a bit of humor to help us navigate the madness.

Channeling Lewis Black's essence, this monologue aims to capture his frustration, humor, and insightful commentary on the absurdities of modern life